<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off-label drug use is&#8230;good?!?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/06/29/off-label-drug-use-isgood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/06/29/off-label-drug-use-isgood/</link>
	<description>An unbiased look at today's health care issues</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Tsai</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/06/29/off-label-drug-use-isgood/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Tsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/06/29/off-label-drug-use-isgood/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>With respect, and revealing that I have trained as a biostatistician and as someone who could benefit financially from drug approval work, I disagree. We already have prominent examples of how drugs not assessed for efficacy (or effectiveness) would fare in the market -- the substances known as "complementary or alternative medicines". 

Unfortunately, people in general are quite gullible and are generally willing to believe ridiculous health claims for just about anything, whether it is noni juice, St. John's wort, etc. They spend their money on 

In an ideal society, people would be better educated as to the efficacy of substances they take. But as long as there are plenty of charlatans and snake-oil sellers out there, it is a public good to make sure that drugs are not simply approved for safety, but for efficacy as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect, and revealing that I have trained as a biostatistician and as someone who could benefit financially from drug approval work, I disagree. We already have prominent examples of how drugs not assessed for efficacy (or effectiveness) would fare in the market &#8212; the substances known as &#8220;complementary or alternative medicines&#8221;. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, people in general are quite gullible and are generally willing to believe ridiculous health claims for just about anything, whether it is noni juice, St. John&#8217;s wort, etc. They spend their money on </p>
<p>In an ideal society, people would be better educated as to the efficacy of substances they take. But as long as there are plenty of charlatans and snake-oil sellers out there, it is a public good to make sure that drugs are not simply approved for safety, but for efficacy as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Cannon</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/06/29/off-label-drug-use-isgood/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/06/29/off-label-drug-use-isgood/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Curious to know Healthcare Economist's email address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious to know Healthcare Economist&#8217;s email address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
