<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAND HIE&#8230;The Sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/05/16/rand-hiethe-sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/05/16/rand-hiethe-sequel/</link>
	<description>An unbiased look at today's health care issues</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scheltgen</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/05/16/rand-hiethe-sequel/#comment-86110</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scheltgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/05/16/rand-hiethe-sequel/#comment-86110</guid>
		<description>Of course the original Rand "experiment" was flawed by the fact that participants were assured of ex post compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the original Rand &#8220;experiment&#8221; was flawed by the fact that participants were assured of ex post compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
