<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Health Insurance and Administrative Expenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/11/02/private-health-insurance-and-administrative-expenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/11/02/private-health-insurance-and-administrative-expenses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Miller, MD</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/11/02/private-health-insurance-and-administrative-expenses/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Miller, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/11/02/private-health-insurance-and-administrative-expenses/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Before someone else goes there, I would like to point out that comparing these numbers to government programs (like Medicare) is not comparing apples to apples.  Specifically, in government programs, the expenses for certain administrative functions (like pensions and payroll) are paid through other government agencies, so these costs don&#039;t get added to the &quot;administrative expenses&quot; line for the health program.   Also, Medicare is still mostly just paying bills, while private insurers are doing more quality and disease management oversight -- the costs of which get counted as administrative.

Thanks, Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before someone else goes there, I would like to point out that comparing these numbers to government programs (like Medicare) is not comparing apples to apples.  Specifically, in government programs, the expenses for certain administrative functions (like pensions and payroll) are paid through other government agencies, so these costs don&#8217;t get added to the &#8220;administrative expenses&#8221; line for the health program.   Also, Medicare is still mostly just paying bills, while private insurers are doing more quality and disease management oversight &#8212; the costs of which get counted as administrative.</p>
<p>Thanks, Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not anybody</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/11/02/private-health-insurance-and-administrative-expenses/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Not anybody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2007/11/02/private-health-insurance-and-administrative-expenses/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>It depends on who you are right?  For some 500% goes to medical costs while others 0%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on who you are right?  For some 500% goes to medical costs while others 0%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

