<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information on pharmaceutical prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farmanux News</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Farmanux News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>[...] Information on pharmaceutical prices Economic theory says that for commodities, there should be one market price. For instance, there is one worldwide price for oil, metals also have a one worldwide price. While there is significant heterogeneity between different types of medical treatments, one would expect that the price of pharmaceuticals would be the same or very [&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Information on pharmaceutical prices Economic theory says that for commodities, there should be one market price. For instance, there is one worldwide price for oil, metals also have a one worldwide price. While there is significant heterogeneity between different types of medical treatments, one would expect that the price of pharmaceuticals would be the same or very [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farmanux News</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Farmanux News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>[...] Economic theory says that for commodities, there should be one market price. For instance, there is one worldwide price for oil, metals also have a one worldwide price. While there is significant heterogeneity between different types of medical treatments, one would expect that the price of pharmaceuticals would be the same or very [&#8230;] Read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Economic theory says that for commodities, there should be one market price. For instance, there is one worldwide price for oil, metals also have a one worldwide price. While there is significant heterogeneity between different types of medical treatments, one would expect that the price of pharmaceuticals would be the same or very [&#8230;] Read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farmanux News</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Farmanux News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>[...] Economic theory says that for commodities, there should be one market price. For instance, there is one worldwide price for oil, metals also have a one worldwide price. While there is significant heterogeneity between different types of medical treatments, one would expect that the price of pharmaceuticals would be the same or very [&#8230;] Read more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Economic theory says that for commodities, there should be one market price. For instance, there is one worldwide price for oil, metals also have a one worldwide price. While there is significant heterogeneity between different types of medical treatments, one would expect that the price of pharmaceuticals would be the same or very [&#8230;] Read more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/02/15/information-on-pharmaceutical-prices/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Jason - thank you for noticing the Rx case study!  Even though both studies (Rx and also the &quot;strep test&quot; case study) were not done with a large sample size nor did we apply complete, third-party academic rigor to our methodology (though approp blinded, randomization was applied)... the point was not to perform a genuine scientific analysis. The point was to validate just how confusing, inequitable, and down-right silly product and services pricing in healthcare can be when someone wants to know, &quot;how much will this cost me?&quot;   (be it someone uninsured or bearing more of the direct cost via higher deductible in a CDHP).

Like in the movie Shrek, healthcare is &quot;...like an onion! Layers, many layers.&quot; The current system just isn&#039;t geared for simplicity nor direct-to-consumer purchasing, which is why efforts that help to point that out may not be perfect, appear flawed or potentially one-sided YET are needed to poke people within the system to say, &quot;This is screwed up. It&#039;s too complex and there is a dire need of more transparency.&quot;

Just wanted to say thanks for noticing our trivial efforts.

- christopher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; thank you for noticing the Rx case study!  Even though both studies (Rx and also the &#8220;strep test&#8221; case study) were not done with a large sample size nor did we apply complete, third-party academic rigor to our methodology (though approp blinded, randomization was applied)&#8230; the point was not to perform a genuine scientific analysis. The point was to validate just how confusing, inequitable, and down-right silly product and services pricing in healthcare can be when someone wants to know, &#8220;how much will this cost me?&#8221;   (be it someone uninsured or bearing more of the direct cost via higher deductible in a CDHP).</p>
<p>Like in the movie Shrek, healthcare is &#8220;&#8230;like an onion! Layers, many layers.&#8221; The current system just isn&#8217;t geared for simplicity nor direct-to-consumer purchasing, which is why efforts that help to point that out may not be perfect, appear flawed or potentially one-sided YET are needed to poke people within the system to say, &#8220;This is screwed up. It&#8217;s too complex and there is a dire need of more transparency.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just wanted to say thanks for noticing our trivial efforts.</p>
<p>- christopher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

