Who values the Social Security Annuity?
March 10, 2008 in Public Policy, Social Security | Permalink
If you were offered an actuarially fair lump-sum payment, would you give up half of your Social Security benefits? This is the question asked by Brown, Casey and Mitchell in their 2008 NBER working paper.
Overall, about 60% of respondents from the HRS data set preferred the lump-sum payment. The authors find the following individuals are more likely to prefer a lump-sum payment over the annuity:
- those with shorter expected longevity or who are in poor health,
- those with more education,
- those with less financial sophistication conditional on education,
- those who believe Social Security benefits will be cut.
Predictably, individuals who think they live longer will choose the annuity since they will get paid over a longer period of time. We also see that those who believe that there is significant political risk (i.e., Social Security benefits will be cut) are more likely to choose the lump-sum benefits.
Men aged between 63 and 67 have only 5% of their assets in private annuities. People have claimed that this was due to one of the following reasons:
- Adverse selection leads to high load factors on annuities, making them a poor value.
- Because they are made up of a fixed payment, Annuities are subject to inflation risk.
- Social Security may be a substitute for private insurance annuities.
The study finds evidence to contradict all three of these hypotheses. Social security benefits are actuarially fair, and inflation-adjusted. If people really benefited from Social Security annuities, than they should be hesitant to give up this stream of payments. Yet three of five people still would prefer a lump sum payment over the Social Security annuity, a type of annuity that offers significant advantages over those offered in the private market.
Maybe Social Security isn’t as valuable as once thought.
- Brown JR, Casey MD, Mitchell, OS. 2008. “Who Values the Social Security Annuity? New Evidence on the Annuity Puzzle,”NBER WP #13800.
Tags: Annuities, Social Security
-
structured settlements on May 27, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Great article. “Maybe Social Security isn’t as valuable as once thought” – I think this may be a huge understatement…
Comments are now closed.
Blogroll
- Barry Shafrin
- Becker-Posner
- Brew Crew Ball
- Cato Blog
- Courtside Analyst
- Covert Rationing
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Economist, The
- Ezra Klein
- Free exchange
- Global Financial Data
- Goolge News: HealthCare
- HC Policy & Marketplace Rev
- Health Affairs Blog
- Health Business Blog
- Health Care Blog
- Health Policy Wonk
- Healthcare Technology News
- JASON SHAFRIN's Homepage
- John Goodman
- la Vanguardia
- Marginal Revolution
- Marketplace (NPR)
- Medical Rants
- Megan McArdle
- Retired Doc’s Thoughts
- Running a Hospital
- Statistical Modeling
- The Treatment
- WonkBlog
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
No comments
Trackback link: http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/03/10/who-values-the-social-security-annuity/trackback/