<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increased Copays for high priced drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/04/14/increased-copays-for-high-priced-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/04/14/increased-copays-for-high-priced-drugs/</link>
	<description>An unbiased look at today's health care issues</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/04/14/increased-copays-for-high-priced-drugs/#comment-146665</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=905#comment-146665</guid>
		<description>I guess it all depends on how you define 'catastrophic risk'; I felt like the article portrayed these higher co-payments as not in the spirit of insurance.  In other words, it read like expensive drugs were part of what insurance should cover, and not just a part of medical care that people should be expected to pay for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it all depends on how you define &#8216;catastrophic risk&#8217;; I felt like the article portrayed these higher co-payments as not in the spirit of insurance.  In other words, it read like expensive drugs were part of what insurance should cover, and not just a part of medical care that people should be expected to pay for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
