Unbiased Analysis of Today's Healthcare Issues

Health Care Around the World: Switzerland

Written By: Jason Shafrin - Apr• 23•08

I have already written about Switzerland in previous posts (see Swiss Healthcare Sytem: Part I, and Part II). Still of all the countries with universal health care, Switzerland’s is the most market-oriented and merits discussion. Switzerland’s health care spending as a percentage of GDP is second only behind the U.S. (11.6% of GDP for Switzerland, 15.3% for the U.S. according to Frontline), yet the government pays for very little of this funding. The Swiss system is similar to the “managed competition” health care plan proposed by the Clintons in the early 1990s.

Percent Insured. 99.5%. Does this mean a mandated system system would lead to universal coverage in the U.S?  This is unlikely.  In Switzerland, a mandate for auto insurance has nearly 100% compliance, but in the U.S. the auto insurance mandate’s compliance rate is only around 83%.

Funding.  Insurance is purchased by individuals.  Individuals generally must pay the full cost of premiums, but the government helps to finance insurance purchases for the poor.  “These subsidies are designed to prevent any individual from having to pay more than 10 percent of income on insurance,” and one third of Swiss citizens receive this type of subsidy.    Thus, the Swiss government only pays for 24.9% of health care costs (compared with 44.7% in the U.S.).

Private Insurance.  All insurance is private insurance.  However, insurance companies are mandated to offer the same “basic benefits package.”  Some physicians operate outside the negotiated schedules and individuals are beginning to purchase supplemental insurance to cover the cost of these higher cost physicians.  Some estimates claim that 40% of Swiss citizens have purchased supplemental insurance.

Physician Compensation.  Physician compensation is negotiated between the insurance companies and doctors on a canton by canton basis.  Balance-billing is not allowed.  Switzerland has strong regulation with respect to nonphysician health care professionals (e.g., nurses, PAs, NPs,) and thus patients are often compelled to use expensive physicians even when this may not be medically necessary.

Physician Choice.  According to a WHO study, Switzerland ranks second only to the U.S. in terms of the ability of patients to choose their provider.

Copayment/Deductibles.  Premiums are community rated and only adjusted for sex and age.  Employers do not pay for workers insurance and thus many Swiss have opted for less expensive plans with higher deductibles.  This has lead to the Swiss paying for 31.5% through out of pocket expenses.

Waiting Times.  According to a WHO study, Switzerland ranks second only to the U.S. in terms of timely care.

Benefits Covered.  All insurers cover the “basic benefits package” so most competition between insurers is based on price and service.  A politically defined benefit package is susceptible to influence from special interest groups.  Thus, Uwe Reinhardt notes that “over time, the growth in compulsory benefits has absorbed an increasing fraction of the consumers’ payment, thus compromising the consumer-driven aspects of the Swiss system.”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

10 Comments

  1. […] and near 100% compliance.  Most states in the U.S. also have mandated auto insurance, but only have 83% compliance.  They may be similar, but there are clearly cultural differences at […]

  2. […] and near 100% compliance.  Most states in the U.S. also have mandated auto insurance, but only have 83% compliance.  They may be similar, but there are clearly cultural differences at […]

  3. […] In fact, of the industrialized democracies with some form of guaranteed universal coverage, every one of them is ahead of the United States in the ranking of overall average life expectancy. Japan is 3rd in the world, at 82.12 years; Australia ranks 7th, at 81.63 years; Switzerland ranks 11th, at 80.85 years, using a unique fully private insurance model where the government organizes and mandates standards for cover…. […]

  4. […] of a national mandate to buy health insurance and other governmental controls. For more, click here and […]

  5. […] The Senate bill does nothing to address the high costs of health care; indeed, increased costs are inevitable because wider access to health insurance does not come cheaply. The US is a wealthy nation so, one might argue, can easily afford an increase in waste and inefficiency as a politically necessary price to pay for a long overdue reform. Eventually, as health costs rise even more, there will be pressure to reduce costs by moving to a single-payer system or, at the very least, to tight regulation of basic health insurance policies along the lines of the Swiss system. […]

  6. […] in line with those of the private sector. Ideally, we would move to a modified version of the Swiss model, in which everyone purchases consumer-driven plans in the individual market, with graduated […]

  7. […] has already been implemented in Switzerland.  I have already written about the Swiss system here, here and here.  One of this plan’s drawback is that risk adjustment will never be exact and […]

  8. […] has already been implemented in Switzerland.  I have already written about the Swiss system here, here and here.”  And while he does point out possible shortcomings of this plan, he goes […]

  9. […] 99.5 percent of the Swiss people are insured with coverage funded by the individual who generally pa… Government subsidies are provided for the poor, with approximately one-third of all Swiss citizens […]

  10. […] Swiss system has a powerful mandate.  They require everyone to buy private insurance.  They also give out […]