<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sample Selection vs. Two-part Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/05/28/sample-selection-vs-two-part-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/05/28/sample-selection-vs-two-part-model/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustav</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/05/28/sample-selection-vs-two-part-model/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=954#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Personally I don´t think he add anything to the debate.
More interestingly, how do you implement it in a longitudinal setting?
Can I still assume independence and estimate the two parts separately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don´t think he add anything to the debate.<br />
More interestingly, how do you implement it in a longitudinal setting?<br />
Can I still assume independence and estimate the two parts separately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

