Unbiased Analysis of Today's Healthcare Issues

Aviodable Mortality in 3 world cities: London vs. New York vs. Paris

Written By: Jason Shafrin - Jun• 13•08

A recent paper by Wesiz et al. (Eur J Pub Health 2008) attempts to compare mortality rates and avoidable mortality rates in the urban core of 3 world cities: London (Inner London); New York (Manhattan) and Paris. Mortality

The authors find that Paris has the lowest mortality rates and New York has the highest mortality rates with London in between.

Avoidable Mortality

Avoidable mortality is death from diseases such as tuberculosis, septicemia, hypertension, influenza, peptic ulcer, appendicitis, etc. Paris also has the lowest avoidable mortality rates while London has the highest and New York in between. The authors also find that the difference between Paris and New York is higher when measuring avoidable mortality than total mortality. Avoidable mortality rates are higher within poor areas of each city.

Interpretation

The authors interpret these findings as avoidable mortality is due to a lack of access to care, especially for the poor. Government provided health insurance is far less prevalent in the U.S. than in the other countries so this access to care in the U.S. may be lower than in other countries. However, it could also be the case the physician practices are better in Paris than in the New York or London. Further, Great Britain also has a national health insurance system yet avoidable mortality is higher in London than in New York. It is possible that the frequency with which the population visits a doctor is culturally different in the three cities in a way that is unrelated to insurance coverage. Thus, while Paris should be celebrated for having the lowest avoidable mortality rate, the cause of their success is unclear from this study and what steps New York or London could take to decrease avoidable mortality are also unclear.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

One Comment

  1. Polly Today says:

    […] Yes, you would expect a doubling of the cash spent to improve the results of a system. But let’s take this measure, the very one that Polly thinks is he way we should measure the system, and see where that takes us, shall we? […]