<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hospital Wristbands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/09/25/hospital-wristbands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/09/25/hospital-wristbands/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akshay Kapur</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/09/25/hospital-wristbands/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Akshay Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=1354#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Standardization is the way to go.  And starting small is the way to do it.  You&#039;re right, if we just get this one thing standardized, see the benefits, report them silly, then maybe one more thing (drug labels, quality measures, etc.) will be looked at and then another...the incremental approach has a lot of merit.  Just look at google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standardization is the way to go.  And starting small is the way to do it.  You&#8217;re right, if we just get this one thing standardized, see the benefits, report them silly, then maybe one more thing (drug labels, quality measures, etc.) will be looked at and then another&#8230;the incremental approach has a lot of merit.  Just look at google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

