<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Insurance in an Experimental Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Economist &#183; Obama&#8217;s Health Care Speech Critique</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/comment-page-1/#comment-4640</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Economist &#183; Obama&#8217;s Health Care Speech Critique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2171#comment-4640</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance. [An individual mandate.  See my previous comments here, here and here.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance. [An individual mandate.  See my previous comments here, here and here.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care: What problem are we trying to solve? &#171; Ilovebenefits&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/comment-page-1/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care: What problem are we trying to solve? &#171; Ilovebenefits&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2171#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>[...] it does.  This blog has reviewed on multiple occasions that small businesses do not have the scale to provide health insurance efficiently. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it does.  This blog has reviewed on multiple occasions that small businesses do not have the scale to provide health insurance efficiently. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Economist &#183; House Bill excludes small business insurance mandate</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/comment-page-1/#comment-4223</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Economist &#183; House Bill excludes small business insurance mandate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2171#comment-4223</guid>
		<description>[...] it does.  This blog has reviewed on multiple occasions that small businesses do not have the scale to provide health insurance efficiently. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it does.  This blog has reviewed on multiple occasions that small businesses do not have the scale to provide health insurance efficiently. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Economist &#183; Tanner on Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/comment-page-1/#comment-3541</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Economist &#183; Tanner on Obamacare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2171#comment-3541</guid>
		<description>[...] Employer Mandate.  Tanner believes employer mandates are a bad idea and I wholeheartedly agree.  Large firms can efficiently offer health insurance and will continue to do so to attract employees.  For small firms, however, they do not have the scale to efficiently offer health insurance.  The employer mandate would stifle small business growth and put a drag on the economy.  An economics experiment also showed employer mandates will adversely affect small businesses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Employer Mandate.  Tanner believes employer mandates are a bad idea and I wholeheartedly agree.  Large firms can efficiently offer health insurance and will continue to do so to attract employees.  For small firms, however, they do not have the scale to efficiently offer health insurance.  The employer mandate would stifle small business growth and put a drag on the economy.  An economics experiment also showed employer mandates will adversely affect small businesses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Economist: Health Insurance in an Experimental Market &#171; Eclectic Buzz Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Economist: Health Insurance in an Experimental Market &#171; Eclectic Buzz Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2171#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>[...] via Healthcare Economist · Health Insurance in an Experimental Market. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Healthcare Economist · Health Insurance in an Experimental Market. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kulow</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/04/01/health-insurance-in-an-experimental-market/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kulow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2171#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>So is GM&#039;s problem with their health care an issue of providing too much coverage or their foreign competitors not having playing by the same rules?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is GM&#8217;s problem with their health care an issue of providing too much coverage or their foreign competitors not having playing by the same rules?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

