<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How did the national debt get so big?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/08/how-did-the-national-debt-get-so-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/08/how-did-the-national-debt-get-so-big/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/08/how-did-the-national-debt-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-3745</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2366#comment-3745</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but isn&#039;t Edgar basically saying pork projects in general, etc is what caused the National debt?

Aren&#039;t we all tired of the bleeding hearts saying, &quot;it&#039;s for the children&quot; we already know that children have been having babies for the past 30 years.  I can understand ANYONE making a mistake and getting pregnant.  We then give them a housing allowance, food stamps, medical care, etc.  Then low and behold they go out and get pregnant again and we double the money their already receiving...why?  I subscribe to the fool me once shame on you...fool me twice shame on me!

From here on out, NO person shall receive any Governmental subsidy that wasn&#039;t earned if they do not submit to drug testing and from this day forward if you get pregnant and can&#039;t or won&#039;t provide the Fathers name of the child you just delivered you&#039;ll receive no benefits from the Government.

In closing, since when did we become a society of bleeding hearts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but isn&#8217;t Edgar basically saying pork projects in general, etc is what caused the National debt?</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t we all tired of the bleeding hearts saying, &#8220;it&#8217;s for the children&#8221; we already know that children have been having babies for the past 30 years.  I can understand ANYONE making a mistake and getting pregnant.  We then give them a housing allowance, food stamps, medical care, etc.  Then low and behold they go out and get pregnant again and we double the money their already receiving&#8230;why?  I subscribe to the fool me once shame on you&#8230;fool me twice shame on me!</p>
<p>From here on out, NO person shall receive any Governmental subsidy that wasn&#8217;t earned if they do not submit to drug testing and from this day forward if you get pregnant and can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t provide the Fathers name of the child you just delivered you&#8217;ll receive no benefits from the Government.</p>
<p>In closing, since when did we become a society of bleeding hearts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bastiat</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/08/how-did-the-national-debt-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bastiat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2366#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but the public choice theorists call this &quot;logrolling.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but the public choice theorists call this &#8220;logrolling.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim jaffe</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/08/how-did-the-national-debt-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>jim jaffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2366#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>Rep. Edgar was certainly one of the good guys, but I wonder about his math.  He seems to suggest that public works -- water projects in particular -- have created today&#039;s deficits and that social spending gets the blame.  Money is, of course, fungible, but I think we&#039;re giving the Corps of Engineers too much credit here and would welcome an analysis that gave us the relative order of magnitude of the two groups.  

You don&#039;t have to be a conservative to conclude that ongoing spending -- which includes social programs like entitlements as well as defense -- is the culprit.  One-time expenses like water projects are insignificant, although sometimes quite useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Edgar was certainly one of the good guys, but I wonder about his math.  He seems to suggest that public works &#8212; water projects in particular &#8212; have created today&#8217;s deficits and that social spending gets the blame.  Money is, of course, fungible, but I think we&#8217;re giving the Corps of Engineers too much credit here and would welcome an analysis that gave us the relative order of magnitude of the two groups.  </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be a conservative to conclude that ongoing spending &#8212; which includes social programs like entitlements as well as defense &#8212; is the culprit.  One-time expenses like water projects are insignificant, although sometimes quite useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

