<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter to Obama: We&#8217;re gonna save $2 trillion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/11/letter-to-obama-were-gonna-save-2-trillion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/11/letter-to-obama-were-gonna-save-2-trillion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AHA: Maybe $2 Trillion’s a little high &#171; Ilovebenefits&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/11/letter-to-obama-were-gonna-save-2-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>AHA: Maybe $2 Trillion’s a little high &#171; Ilovebenefits&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2428#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week a consortium of health insurers, health providers, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers claimed that they could save the country $2 trillion in health care costs.  I was skeptical of this claim. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week a consortium of health insurers, health providers, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers claimed that they could save the country $2 trillion in health care costs.  I was skeptical of this claim. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Economist &#183; AHA: Maybe $2 Trillion&#8217;s a little high</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/11/letter-to-obama-were-gonna-save-2-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-3185</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Economist &#183; AHA: Maybe $2 Trillion&#8217;s a little high</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2428#comment-3185</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week a consortium of health insurers, health providers, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers claimed that they could save the country $2 trillion in health care costs.  I was skeptical of this claim. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week a consortium of health insurers, health providers, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers claimed that they could save the country $2 trillion in health care costs.  I was skeptical of this claim. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch Me Pull $2 Trillion in Savings Out of My Hat &#171; Carolynn&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/11/letter-to-obama-were-gonna-save-2-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Me Pull $2 Trillion in Savings Out of My Hat &#171; Carolynn&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2428#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>[...] magic of  Obama&#8217;s proposed $2 Trillion in savings on health care.   Jason Shafrin the Health Care Economist does a great job of breaking down the numbers&#8230;and I do mean &#8220;breaking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] magic of  Obama&#8217;s proposed $2 Trillion in savings on health care.   Jason Shafrin the Health Care Economist does a great job of breaking down the numbers&#8230;and I do mean &#8220;breaking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

