<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take-up of Medicare Part D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/26/take-up-of-medicare-part-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/26/take-up-of-medicare-part-d/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsureBlog</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/26/take-up-of-medicare-part-d/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>InsureBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2417#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cavalcade of Risk: 3rd Anniversary Edition...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hard as it is to believe, this edition of the Cavalcade marks our 3rd Anniversary. As has become our tradition, we&#039;re including posts only from those who submitted (hosts know that ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cavalcade of Risk: 3rd Anniversary Edition&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hard as it is to believe, this edition of the Cavalcade marks our 3rd Anniversary. As has become our tradition, we&#8217;re including posts only from those who submitted (hosts know that &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Wonk Review: Bosstown edition &#171; Boston Health News</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/26/take-up-of-medicare-part-d/comment-page-1/#comment-3327</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Wonk Review: Bosstown edition &#171; Boston Health News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2417#comment-3327</guid>
		<description>[...] Shafrin at Healthcare Economistnotes that Medicare Part D plan was supposed to provide a prescription drug benefit for those who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shafrin at Healthcare Economistnotes that Medicare Part D plan was supposed to provide a prescription drug benefit for those who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

