<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama v. Nixon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-20953</link>
		<dc:creator>John S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-20953</guid>
		<description>&quot;supplier-induced demand&quot;

I love people who argue that something will be more expensive when you increase its supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;supplier-induced demand&#8221;</p>
<p>I love people who argue that something will be more expensive when you increase its supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican Platform of 1956 &#124; Just Say Why</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-9218</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican Platform of 1956 &#124; Just Say Why</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-9218</guid>
		<description>[...] to change that much in the next 50 years.What if I was to inform you that the health plan that Nixon proposed is very similar to Obama&#8217;s, yet hardly a single Republican voted for it. (Only the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to change that much in the next 50 years.What if I was to inform you that the health plan that Nixon proposed is very similar to Obama&#8217;s, yet hardly a single Republican voted for it. (Only the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caitlin</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-7144</link>
		<dc:creator>caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-7144</guid>
		<description>Nixon&#039;s health care reform was better. It was also cheaper and more effective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nixon&#8217;s health care reform was better. It was also cheaper and more effective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicans Only Have A Hammer So They Will Treat Everything Like A Nail &#171; A Loyal Opposition</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-6931</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicans Only Have A Hammer So They Will Treat Everything Like A Nail &#171; A Loyal Opposition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-6931</guid>
		<description>[...] passed without the public option and with market-based solutions that are most reminiscent of the health-care bill introduced by President Richard Nixon. It passed with a Congressional Budget Office estimate that shows it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] passed without the public option and with market-based solutions that are most reminiscent of the health-care bill introduced by President Richard Nixon. It passed with a Congressional Budget Office estimate that shows it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If Republicans Only Have A Hammer, They Will Treat Everything Like A Nail &#171; A Loyal Opposition</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-6930</link>
		<dc:creator>If Republicans Only Have A Hammer, They Will Treat Everything Like A Nail &#171; A Loyal Opposition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-6930</guid>
		<description>[...] passed without the public option and with market-based solutions that are most reminiscent of the health-care bill introduced by President Richard Nixon. It passed with a Congressional Budget Office estimate that shows it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] passed without the public option and with market-based solutions that are most reminiscent of the health-care bill introduced by President Richard Nixon. It passed with a Congressional Budget Office estimate that shows it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Conlon Fans &#187; My Shared Items: Week of January 24th, 2010</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-6253</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Conlon Fans &#187; My Shared Items: Week of January 24th, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-6253</guid>
		<description>[...] Healthcare Economist &#183; Obama v. Nixon &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Healthcare Economist &middot; Obama v. Nixon &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Brown&#8217;s win really means &#171; Some Country for Old Men</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-6133</link>
		<dc:creator>What Brown&#8217;s win really means &#171; Some Country for Old Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-6133</guid>
		<description>[...] of the American fabric, even though it’s a more conservative approach than both Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon (yes, that Richard Nixon) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the American fabric, even though it’s a more conservative approach than both Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon (yes, that Richard Nixon) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare Reform, Then And Now : The New Nixon: News and Commentary about the President, his Times, and his Legacy</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-4708</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare Reform, Then And Now : The New Nixon: News and Commentary about the President, his Times, and his Legacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-4708</guid>
		<description>[...] Schafrin, a young economist trained at UCSD, breaks down RN&#8217;s 1974 message to Congress and proposal for a comprehensive health insurance plan, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schafrin, a young economist trained at UCSD, breaks down RN&#8217;s 1974 message to Congress and proposal for a comprehensive health insurance plan, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything you need to know about U.S. health care reform &#171; alek davis: personal blog</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/09/14/obama-v-nixon/comment-page-1/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything you need to know about U.S. health care reform &#171; alek davis: personal blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2995#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>[...] is a bit like a fire department that turns a profit by letting buildings burn down.&#8221; Obama v. Nixon Analysis of the President Barack Obama&#8217;s address on health care reform with the similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a bit like a fire department that turns a profit by letting buildings burn down.&#8221; Obama v. Nixon Analysis of the President Barack Obama&#8217;s address on health care reform with the similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

