<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Certificate of Need Laws and Cardiac Surgery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/04/certificate-of-need-laws-and-cardiac-surgery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/04/certificate-of-need-laws-and-cardiac-surgery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care Degrees Programs</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/04/certificate-of-need-laws-and-cardiac-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-4918</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care Degrees Programs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2952#comment-4918</guid>
		<description>Hi, nice post. Thanks for  your post on topic - Healthcare Economist. I always like such type of informative post and look forward to read more article from you in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, nice post. Thanks for  your post on topic &#8211; Healthcare Economist. I always like such type of informative post and look forward to read more article from you in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shafrin</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/04/certificate-of-need-laws-and-cardiac-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-4861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2952#comment-4861</guid>
		<description>The &quot;plagued with supplier-induced demand&quot; was my own editorial and not that of the study authors.  The authors state that the repeal of CON laws SHIFTED CABG surgeries from incumbents to new entrants and from low-quality to high quality sites (on average).  However, this efficiency gain was somewhat offset by the large fixed costs to establish a CABG center of care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;plagued with supplier-induced demand&#8221; was my own editorial and not that of the study authors.  The authors state that the repeal of CON laws SHIFTED CABG surgeries from incumbents to new entrants and from low-quality to high quality sites (on average).  However, this efficiency gain was somewhat offset by the large fixed costs to establish a CABG center of care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert James Cimasi</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/04/certificate-of-need-laws-and-cardiac-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-4859</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert James Cimasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2952#comment-4859</guid>
		<description>&quot;In general, prohibiting entry into a market would seem to be welfare destroying. In a health care system plagued with supplier-induced demand, however, this need not be the case.....However, in a world with Medicare fee-for-service–and Medicare pays for 54% of all CABG procedures–CON laws may be a necessary evil to stem the tide of rising healthcare costs.&quot;

Perhaps I missed it.  Did the working paper establish the existence and degree of &quot;supplier-induced demand&quot; for CABG surgeries?  Or was this just a surmise, based on the acceptance of &quot;conventional wisdom&quot;?

Respectfully,

Bob

Robert James Cimasi, MHA, ASA, CBA, AVA, CM&amp;AA
President
HEALTH CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, LLC
1143 Olivette Executive Parkway
St. Louis, MO   63132-3205</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In general, prohibiting entry into a market would seem to be welfare destroying. In a health care system plagued with supplier-induced demand, however, this need not be the case&#8230;..However, in a world with Medicare fee-for-service–and Medicare pays for 54% of all CABG procedures–CON laws may be a necessary evil to stem the tide of rising healthcare costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps I missed it.  Did the working paper establish the existence and degree of &#8220;supplier-induced demand&#8221; for CABG surgeries?  Or was this just a surmise, based on the acceptance of &#8220;conventional wisdom&#8221;?</p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>Bob</p>
<p>Robert James Cimasi, MHA, ASA, CBA, AVA, CM&amp;AA<br />
President<br />
HEALTH CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, LLC<br />
1143 Olivette Executive Parkway<br />
St. Louis, MO   63132-3205</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

