<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Efficiency Measures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/21/common-efficiency-measures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/21/common-efficiency-measures/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shafrin</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/21/common-efficiency-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3016#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>I agree.  However, measuring quality (or effectiveness) is often difficult in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  However, measuring quality (or effectiveness) is often difficult in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PookieMD</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/21/common-efficiency-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-4966</link>
		<dc:creator>PookieMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3016#comment-4966</guid>
		<description>The issue with efficiency is that it does not necessarily measure effectiveness. Take physician efficiency--a physician may be able to churn through 50% more patients than his slower partner, but if he is not ordering the right tests, making the right diagnosis etc., he is not effective.  Therefore the metric can lead to unintended consequences--seeing more patients, but poor patient care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with efficiency is that it does not necessarily measure effectiveness. Take physician efficiency&#8211;a physician may be able to churn through 50% more patients than his slower partner, but if he is not ordering the right tests, making the right diagnosis etc., he is not effective.  Therefore the metric can lead to unintended consequences&#8211;seeing more patients, but poor patient care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

