<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Reform Bill&#8217;s Impact on the Number of Uninsured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/11/23/house-reform-bills-impact-on-the-number-of-uninsured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/11/23/house-reform-bills-impact-on-the-number-of-uninsured/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/11/23/house-reform-bills-impact-on-the-number-of-uninsured/comment-page-1/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3319#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>This piece of legislation would be worthwhile even if it only eliminated the current insurance industry&#039;s abuses of denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions or eliminating life time caps on coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece of legislation would be worthwhile even if it only eliminated the current insurance industry&#8217;s abuses of denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions or eliminating life time caps on coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c3</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/11/23/house-reform-bills-impact-on-the-number-of-uninsured/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>c3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3319#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>I mean, who wouldn&#039;t want the &quot;same for less&quot;.  That will also be the key.  I think of our &quot;public hospitals&quot;.  Why don&#039;t more people who don&#039;t have to go to them go to them ?  Will public plans be able to compete on quality and &quot;patient preference factors&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, who wouldn&#8217;t want the &#8220;same for less&#8221;.  That will also be the key.  I think of our &#8220;public hospitals&#8221;.  Why don&#8217;t more people who don&#8217;t have to go to them go to them ?  Will public plans be able to compete on quality and &#8220;patient preference factors&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

