<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Healthcare Worker Demand: 2009 Q4 Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2010/01/13/healthcare-worker-demand-2009-q4-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2010/01/13/healthcare-worker-demand-2009-q4-data/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cherner</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2010/01/13/healthcare-worker-demand-2009-q4-data/comment-page-1/#comment-6062</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cherner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3497#comment-6062</guid>
		<description>Our firm, Health Workforce Solutions LLC, that developed the index, started with the largest Case-Shiller areas.  Our plan is to extend it from the existing 30 to 36 sometime in the next quarter or two.  Research Triangle will definitely be included.  As it is, the LMPI provides a great leading indicator of near-term demand in 30 of the largest healthcare labor markets in the country.  

Cheers!

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our firm, Health Workforce Solutions LLC, that developed the index, started with the largest Case-Shiller areas.  Our plan is to extend it from the existing 30 to 36 sometime in the next quarter or two.  Research Triangle will definitely be included.  As it is, the LMPI provides a great leading indicator of near-term demand in 30 of the largest healthcare labor markets in the country.  </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjc</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2010/01/13/healthcare-worker-demand-2009-q4-data/comment-page-1/#comment-6058</link>
		<dc:creator>cjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3497#comment-6058</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, though it appears to omit important areas like, say, the Research Triangle in North Carolina.  How good an index is this if it doesn&#039;t include such an important center of medical work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, though it appears to omit important areas like, say, the Research Triangle in North Carolina.  How good an index is this if it doesn&#8217;t include such an important center of medical work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

