For patients with osteoarthritis, the answer is not at all.
A paper in the New England Journal of Medicine examined 180 patients 75 years old or younger, that had osteoarthritis of the knee, and reported at least moderate knee pain on average despite medical treatment. The researchers randomized this individuals into three groups:
- Surgery Group #1 (Lavage): The joint was lavaged with at least 10 liters of fluid. Anything that could be flushed out through arthroscopic cannulas was removed. Normally, no instruments were used to mechanically débride or remove tissue.
- Surgery Group #2 (Débridement): The joint was lavaged with at least 10 liters of fluid, rough articular cartilage was shaved (chondroplasty was performed), loose debris was removed, all torn or degenerated meniscal fragments were trimmed, and the remaining meniscus was smoothed to a firm and stable rim.through arthroscopic cannulas was removed. Normally, no instruments were used to mechanically débride or remove tissue.
- Placebo Procedure: To preserve blinding in the event that patients in the placebo group did not have total amnesia, a standard arthroscopic débridement procedure was simulated. After the knee was prepped and draped, three 1-cm incisions were made in the skin. The surgeon asked for all instruments and manipulated the knee as if arthroscopy were being performed. Saline was splashed to simulate the sounds of lavage.
The authors compared patient pain levels in these three groups before the surgery and after the surgery at regular increments (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.) The authors found that “At no point did either arthroscopic-intervention group have greater pain relief than the placebo group.”

The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction
September 30, 2011 in Books, Contagious Disease, Medical Studies | 1 comment
I recently finished reading a great book by William Bynum called The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction. The book does just what it says: provides a great introduction to the history of medicine. It is concise and interesting throughout. The contents are divided into six chapters:
This chart explains the differences between the first five kinds of medicine.
There are many interesting nuggets of information from this book and picking out a few is difficult. I’ll settle for two which discuss the unintended consequences of the invention of anesthesia and antibiotics:
“Giving surgeons more time to operate made conserving tissues easier, but the longer exposure of the open wounds to the air also increased the possibility of post-operative infection. Consequently, anaesthesia enlarged the range of operations surgeons could perform, but not necessarily the changes of a patient’s surviving the ordeal.”
“The causative agents of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV have all developed resistance to many of their conventional treatments, complicating these major world diseases. The hospital has not ’caused’ this phenomenon; human agency has. But drug-resistant pathogens are now so common that modern hospitals sometimes lose their desired epithet, as ‘houses of healing,’ and revert to that old one, ‘gateways to death.’”
Here is Amazon’s summary of the book:
Taking a thematic rather than strictly chronological approach, W.F. Bynum, explores the key turning points in the history of Western medicine-such as the first surgical procedures, the advent of hospitals, the introduction of anesthesia, X-Rays, vaccinations, and many other innovations, as well as the rise of experimental medicine. The book also explores Western medicine’s encounters with Chinese and Indian medicine, as well as nontraditional treatments such as homeopathy, chiropractic, and other alternative medicines.
Tags: Books, History, Medicine