<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Healthcare Economist &#187; Medical Studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcare-economist.com/category/medical-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcare-economist.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are you depressed?</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/11/22/are-you-depressed/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/11/22/are-you-depressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=5756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the question that that clinicians often have to ask.  Depression certainly operates along a scale and it is often difficult to quantify either i) if a person is depressed or ii) how depressed they are. One option to assess patient depression is the PHQ-9.  The assessment asks patients nine questions regarding their mental [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the question that that clinicians often have to ask.  Depression certainly operates along a scale and it is often difficult to quantify either i) if a person is depressed or ii) how depressed they are.</p>
<p>One option to assess patient depression is the <a href="http://www.depression-primarycare.org/clinicians/toolkits/materials/forms/phq9/">PHQ-9</a>.  The assessment asks patients nine questions regarding their mental health status.  The patient&#8217;s depression level can be quantified on a <a href="http://www.depression-primarycare.org/clinicians/toolkits/materials/forms/phq9/severity_scoring/">scale from 0-27</a> and practitioners can use this information to provide a <a href="http://www.depression-primarycare.org/clinicians/toolkits/materials/forms/phq9/score_table/">tentative diagnosis</a>.</p>
<p>The PHQ-9, like many assessment, relies on patient self-reports which depend on the communication skills of the patient.  Further, depression can be transitive in some cases; thus additional PHQ-9 questionnaires will need to be conducted over time.  Still the PHQ-9 can be a useful tool for physicians assessing patient depression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/11/22/are-you-depressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/09/30/the-history-of-medicine-a-very-short-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/09/30/the-history-of-medicine-a-very-short-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contagious Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=5646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently finished reading a great book by William Bynum called The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction. The book does just what it says: provides a great introduction to the history of medicine.  It is concise and interesting throughout.  The contents are divided into six chapters: Medicine at the bedside Medicine in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently finished reading a great book by William Bynum called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/History-Medicine-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/019921543X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1312771856&amp;sr=8-1">The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction</a>. The book does just what it says: provides a great introduction to the history of medicine.  It is concise and interesting throughout.  The contents are divided into six chapters:</p>
<ul>
<li>Medicine at the bedside</li>
<li>Medicine in the library</li>
<li>Medicine in the hospital</li>
<li>Medicine in the community</li>
<li>Medicine in the laboratory</li>
<li>Medicine in the modern world.</li>
</ul>
<p>This <strong><a href="https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&amp;hl=en_US&amp;key=0AqBLM3x5sYdBdDlhcm0wa20zYnMxTERoZm02YkdVa3c&amp;output=html">chart</a></strong> explains the differences between the first five kinds of medicine.</p>
<p>There are many interesting nuggets of information from this book and picking out a few is difficult.  I&#8217;ll settle for two which discuss the unintended consequences of the invention of anesthesia and antibiotics:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Giving surgeons more time to operate made conserving tissues easier, but the longer exposure of the open wounds to the air also increased the possibility of post-operative infection.  Consequently, anaesthesia enlarged the range of operations surgeons could perform, but not necessarily the changes of a patient&#8217;s surviving the ordeal.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>The causative agents of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV have all developed resistance to many of their conventional treatments, complicating these major world diseases.  The hospital has not &#8217;caused&#8217; this phenomenon; human agency has.  But drug-resistant pathogens are now so common that modern hospitals sometimes lose their desired epithet, as &#8216;houses of healing,&#8217; and revert to that old one, &#8216;gateways to death.&#8217;</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/History-Medicine-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/019921543X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1312771856&amp;sr=8-1">Amazon&#8217;s</a> summary of the book:</p>
<p>Taking a thematic rather than strictly chronological approach, W.F. Bynum, explores the key turning points in the history of Western medicine-such as the first surgical procedures, the advent of hospitals, the introduction of anesthesia, X-Rays, vaccinations, and many other innovations, as well as the rise of experimental medicine. The book also explores Western medicine&#8217;s encounters with Chinese and Indian medicine, as well as nontraditional treatments such as homeopathy, chiropractic, and other alternative medicines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/09/30/the-history-of-medicine-a-very-short-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do doctors adopt an innovation?</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/09/20/why-do-doctors-adopt-an-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/09/20/why-do-doctors-adopt-an-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissemination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Adoption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=5758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;re a researcher.  You just came up with a new medical treatment that is far superior to the previous treatment.  How do you get physicians to adopt your method/technology? Most researchers believe that providing the physician with evidence of the new treatment superiority is the number one factor driving adoption.  In a presentation at this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a researcher.  You just came up with a new medical treatment that is far superior to the previous treatment.  How do you get physicians to adopt your method/technology?</p>
<p>Most researchers believe that providing the physician with evidence of the new treatment superiority is the number one factor driving adoption.  In a presentation at this year&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ahrq.gov/about/annlconf11.htm">AHRQ&#8217;s 2011 Annual Conference</a>, I found out this is not the case at all.  Evidence is important.  Physicians, however, are much more likely to adopt a new technique/innovation if it has three characteristics:</p>
<ul>
<li>Low cost</li>
<li>Simplicity</li>
<li>Compatibility</li>
</ul>
<p>In reality, all three of these factors deal with cost.  The first examines the acquisition cost, the second deals with the time cost to learn to use the new procedure, and the third describes the cost of integrating the new technique within existing operations.  These costs generally can be accurately estimated for most innovations.</p>
<p>On the other hand, most evidence cites benefits for patients or other stakeholders.  Even if an innovation claims to be cost-effective from the provider&#8217;s perspective, physicians must risk that these promises will not come to pass.</p>
<p>The seminal technology adoption study examines the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_adoption_lifecycle">spread of hybrid corn in Iowa</a>.  Although there was significant evidence that hybrid corn was better than the status quo, there was still significant risk to the farmer since the hybrid corn was much more expensive than regular corn.  It took the adoption of a thought leader for hybrid corn adoption to truly spread.  This is why pharmaceutical companies spend so much money to get respected docs to endorse their products; it leads to more rapid spread of their drug than can even be accomplished by direct-to-consumer advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/09/20/why-do-doctors-adopt-an-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving Placebo Effectiveness at Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/08/16/improving-placebo-effectiveness-at-kaiser/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/08/16/improving-placebo-effectiveness-at-kaiser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaiser Permanente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=5661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to my first physician appointment as a member of Kaiser.  I received a primary care visit and got lab work done within 30 minutes.  The whole process was incredibly efficient.  I notice the Kaiser docs and nurses followed best practices.  Further, the check-in process was very organized and my doctor could access my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to my first physician appointment as a member of Kaiser.  I received a primary care visit and got lab work done within 30 minutes.  The whole process was incredibly efficient.  I notice the Kaiser docs and nurses followed best practices.  Further, the check-in process was very organized and my doctor could access my medical record electronically.  Further, the next day I could access my lab results online.  Overall, it was a very efficient experience.</p>
<p>The process as completely different from the alternative medicine described in a recent Atlantic article, &#8216;<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/07/the-triumph-of-new-age-medicine/8554/">The Triumph of New Age Medicine</a>&#8216;.  Consider the case of a 60-year-old retired firefighter who had come in for an acupuncture treatment.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>His wife, a nurse, urged him to try acupuncture, and in February, with the blessing of his doctor, he finally met with Lao, who had trained in his native China as an acupuncturist. Their first visit had lasted well over an hour, Corasaniti says, time mostly spent discussing every aspect of his injuries and what seemed to ease or exacerbate them, and also other aspects of his health—he had been gaining weight, he was constipated, he was developing urinary problems. They talked at length about his diet, his physical activity, his responsibilities and how they weighed on him. Lao focused in on stress—what was causing it in Corasaniti’s life, and how did it aggravate the pain?—and they discussed the importance of finding ways to relax in everyday life.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Does acupuncture work?  Depends by what you mean by &#8216;work&#8217;.   <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.20225/abstract">This study</a> found that acupuncture worked no better than a &#8216;sham acupuncture&#8217;.  However, <a href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/12/why-does-acupuncture-work/">acupuncture does work</a>.  Although acupuncture is equally effective as sham acupuncture, sham acupuncture actually does help improve health.  Further, acupuncture is <a href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/12/08/placebo-vs-placebo/">more effective than taking a sugar pill placebo</a>.  Thus, the quality of the placebo&#8211;in terms of perceived cost and ritual surrounding the placebo&#8211;does improve health.</p>
<p>What can Kaiser learn from these findings?  Combining best practice medicine with better placebos such as more elaborate rituals of patient-provider interaction may improve the quality of care provided.</p>
<p>Creating a warmer, placebo-filled environment could put the patient in a better state of mind and better allow the patient to use positive thinking to heal themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2011/08/16/improving-placebo-effectiveness-at-kaiser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgical Complications and Mortality Rates</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/12/16/surgical-complications-and-mortality-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/12/16/surgical-complications-and-mortality-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mortality during surgery is dependent on two factors.  The first is the probability of having complications during surgery.  The second is the probability of dying conditional on having a complication.  One would expect that hospitals with low mortality rates would have both fewer complications and lower probability of death conditional on a complication.   A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mortality during surgery is dependent on two factors.  The first is the probability of having complications during surgery.  The second is the probability of dying conditional on having a complication.  One would expect that hospitals with low mortality rates would have both fewer complications and lower probability of death conditional on a complication.  </p>
<p>A paper by <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/361/14/1368">Gheferi, Birkmeyer, and Dimick (NEJM 2009)</a> shows that this may not be the case.  After risk adjustment complication rates were not significantly higher in high mortality hospitals.  However, conditional on there being a complication, mortality rates were much higher in high mortality hospitals than low mortality hospitals.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3163  aligncenter" title="In Hospital Mortality (Gheferi et al. NEJM 2009)" src="http://healthcare-economist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/In-Hospital-Mortality-NEJM-2009-300x219.jpg" alt="In Hospital Mortality (Gheferi et al. NEJM 2009)" width="300" height="219" /></p>
<p>How can doctors decrease mortality due to complications?  Gheferi, Birkmeyer, and Dimick recommend &#8220;timely administration of antibiotics in patients with sepsis, the rapid transfer of a patient to an intensive care unit (ICU), and the availability of interventional cardiologists during an acute myocardial infarction.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li><small>Gheferi, Birkmeyer, and Dimick (2009) &#8220;<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/361/14/1368">Variation in Hospital Mortality Associated with Inpatient Surgery</a>&#8221; <em>NEJM</em>, 361(14):1368-1375</small>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/12/16/surgical-complications-and-mortality-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>H1N1: Do I have it?  Do I need a vaccine?</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/20/h1n1-do-i-have-it-do-i-need-a-vaccine/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/20/h1n1-do-i-have-it-do-i-need-a-vaccine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contagious Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influenza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=3165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two weeks ago, the U.S. government released its H1N1 vaccine to the public.  Many people have had a number of questions about whether or not they should get the vaccine.  The CDC website has a list of Key Facts and a Q&#38;A section that is helpful.   There are five major groups who should have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago, the U.S. government released its H1N1 vaccine to the public.  Many people have had a number of questions about whether or not they should get the vaccine.  The <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/">CDC website</a> has a list of <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_keyfacts.htm">Key Facts</a> and a <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm">Q&amp;A section</a> that is helpful.  </p>
<p>There are five major groups who should have priority of getting the vaccine:</p>
<ul>
<li>pregnant women,</li>
<li>people who live with or provide care for infants younger than 6 months (e.g., parents, siblings, and day care providers),</li>
<li>health care and emergency medical services personnel,</li>
<li>people 6 months through 24 years of age, and,</li>
<li>people 25 years through 64 years of age who have certain medical conditions that put them at higher risk for influenza-related complications.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are a number of people who should <em>NOT</em> get the vaccine.</p>
<ul>
<li>People who have a severe allergy to chicken eggs.</li>
<li>People who have had a severe reaction to an influenza vaccination.</li>
<li>People who developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) within 6 weeks of getting an influenza vaccine previously.</li>
<li>Children younger than 6 months of age (influenza vaccine is not approved for this age group), and</li>
<li>People who have a moderate-to-severe illness with a fever (they should wait until they recover to get vaccinated.)</li>
</ul>
<p>The H1N1 vaccine is prepared using the same method as used for the seasonal flu.  However, because the H1N1 vaccine was developed too late, it could not be added to the seasonal flu vaccine.  Thus there are two flu shots available now, one for the seasonal flu and one for H1N1. </p>
<p>If you think you have the H1N1 illness, you can use this<a href="https://h1n1.cloudapp.net/Default.aspx"> self assessment tool </a>to verify whether or not you should see a doctor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/10/20/h1n1-do-i-have-it-do-i-need-a-vaccine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Advances</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/06/07/medical-advances/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/06/07/medical-advances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=2570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Economist&#8216;s Technology Quarterly reveals some recent advances in medical technology: Cockroachs: A model for artificial hearts. A laser that would make Dr. Evil proud: one that fights malaria. Mobile phones used to monitor Tb compliance. No more MRIs?  The advent of photoacoustic imaging.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Economist</em>&#8216;s Technology Quarterly reveals some recent advances in medical technology:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="On the pulse" href="http://www.economist.com/science/tm/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13400718">Cockroachs</a>: A model for artificial hearts.</li>
<li><a title="Zap!" href="http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13725733">A laser that would make Dr. Evil proud</a>: one that fights malaria.</li>
<li><a title="Taken your medicine?" href="http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13725667">Mobile phones used to monitor Tb compliance</a>.</li>
<li><a title="The sound of light" href="http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13725693">No more MRIs</a>?  The advent of photoacoustic imaging.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/06/07/medical-advances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Naked</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/01/26/getting-naked/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/01/26/getting-naked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harrassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=1826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The physician-patient interaction can be a strange one.  Patients leave their most important possession&#8211;themselves&#8211;in the hand of strangers.  Typically conservative women will bare their naked bodies to physicians.   Although rare, the possibility exists for the physician to take advantage of this situation.   In the U.S. &#8220;4 percent of the disciplinary order that state medical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The physician-patient interaction can be a strange one.  Patients leave their most important possession&#8211;themselves&#8211;in the hand of strangers.  Typically conservative women will bare their naked bodies to physicians.   Although rare, the possibility exists for the physician to take advantage of this situation.  </p>
<p>In the U.S. &#8220;4 percent of the disciplinary order that state medical boards issue against physicians are for sex-related offenses&#8230;Seventy two percent of females medical students and twenty nine percent of male medical sudents have been victors of patient initiated sexual behavoir.&#8221;  I know of patients who slap cute medical assistants&#8217; behind.  Physicians and patients can both act inappropriately.</p>
<p>How do physicians establish trust with their patients?</p>
<p>Atul Gawande gives some examples from around the world in <em><a title="Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Better-Surgeons-Performance-Atul-Gawande/dp/0805082115" target="_blank">Better: A Surgeon&#8217;s Notes on Performance</a></em>.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Afghanistan</strong>: When a male physician examines a female patient,  they are separated by an opaque screen with a two-inch circle cut into the screen. &#8220;Behind it, the woman is covered from head to toe by her burka. The two do not talk directly to each other. The patient&#8217;s young son serves as the go-between.&#8221; S</li>
<li><strong>Iraq</strong>: Family members are present in the exam room whenever there is a male physician examining a female patient.</li>
<li><strong>Venezuela</strong>: A nurse chaperone is present any time there is a breast or pelvic exam.  The exam will not take place without the presence of the chaperone.</li>
<li><strong>England</strong>: A nurse chaperone is present any time a patient undergoes a breast, pelvic or abdominal exam.</li>
<li><strong>Ukraine</strong>: A nurse chaperone or family member is rarely present in the examine room, but cultural mores help to maintain a professional tone.  Patients always address the physician as Dr. ____, and the physician addresses the patient as Mr. or Mrs. _____.</li>
</ul>
<p>Gawande, Atul (2007) <em><a title="Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Better-Surgeons-Performance-Atul-Gawande/dp/0805082115" target="_blank">Better: A Surgeon&#8217;s Notes on Performance</a></em>, Metropolitan Books, 288 pages.</p>
<p>Gawande A (2005) &#8220;<a title="Gawande (2005)" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/353/7/645" target="_blank">Naked</a>&#8221; <em>NEJM</em>, 353:645-648.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/01/26/getting-naked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we die?</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/01/23/why-do-we-die/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/01/23/why-do-we-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=1890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What factors predict how long we live?  What are the best ways to forestall death? The determinants of premature death are 40% behavoiral, 30% genetic, but only 10% medical care.  It is important to remember that medical care and health are far from synonomous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What factors predict how long we live?  What are the best ways to forestall death?</p>
<p><a title="From Schroeder SA (NEJM 2007)" href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dc9j3ksm_898fmw9q4gm" target="_blank"><strong>The determinants of premature death are 40% behavoiral, 30% genetic, but only 10% medical care</strong></a>.  It is important to remember that medical care and health are far from synonomous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/01/23/why-do-we-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>700 billion reasons to read the Health Wonk Review</title>
		<link>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/10/02/700-billion-reasons-to-read-the-health-wonk-review/</link>
		<comments>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/10/02/700-billion-reasons-to-read-the-health-wonk-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shafrin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carnivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HWR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcare-economist.com/?p=1388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Senate passing a $700 billion Wall Street bail-out last night, the Healthcare Economist wonders who else needs a bail out.  The best and brightest health bloggers have your answer.  In this edition of the Health Wonk Review, we will examine six groups looking for help: Wall Street Health Insurers Healthcare Reformers Doctors The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Senate passing a $700 billion Wall Street bail-out last night, the Healthcare Economist wonders who else needs a bail out.  The best and brightest health bloggers have your answer.  In this edition of the Health Wonk Review, we will examine six groups looking for help:</p>
<ul>
<li>Wall Street</li>
<li>Health Insurers</li>
<li>Healthcare Reformers</li>
<li>Doctors</li>
<li>The Uninsured</li>
<li>Kids</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WALL STREET</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Julie Ferguson of Workers Comp Insider explains <a title="AIG: Farewell, My (Not-So) Lovely?" href="http://www.workerscompinsider.com/archives/000936.html" target="_blank">how the biggest insurer on the planet suddenly runs out of money</a>.</li>
<li>Roy Poses of Health Care Renewal: <a title="Failed &quot;Masters of the Universe&quot; Running a Renowned Teaching Hospital" href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2008/09/failed-masters-of-universe-running.html" target="_blank">the board of the illustrious New York-Presbyterian teaching hospital included four corporate executives from Morgan Stanley, Lehman, Merrill Lynch and AIG</a>.  None of these four executives had any particular knowledge of health care.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HEALTH INSURERS </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>David Hamilton of Health Care Industry finds that the Wall Street meltdown will create huge losses for <a title="Aetna Also Exposed to Lehman, AIG for $234M" href="http://industry.bnet.com/healthcare/1000166/aetna-also-exposed-to-lehman-aig-for-234m/" target="_blank">Aetna</a> ($234m), <a title="Humana Faces Possible $62M Letdown From Lehman" href="http://industry.bnet.com/healthcare/1000161/humana-faces-possible-62m-letdown-from-lehman/">Humana</a> ($62m) and <a title="WellPoint Takes Another Hit — This Time From Fannie and Freddie" href="http://industry.bnet.com/healthcare/1000153/wellpoint-takes-another-hit-this-time-from-fannie-and-freddie/">Wellpoint </a> ($211m).</li>
<li>David Kibbe of The Health Care Blog wonders if we will need <a title="Will We Need a Bailout of the Health Care System, Too?" href="http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2008/09/will-we-need-a.html" target="_blank">a bailout of the health care system as well</a>.</li>
<li>Beth Capell looks at <a href="http://www.health-access.org/2008/09/further-observations-on-insurer.htm">HMO insolvency</a> at Health Access WeBlog.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HEALTHCARE REFORMERS</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Anthony Wright of Health Access WeBlog reminds us that the <strong><a title=" Health reform in the economic aftermath..." href="http://www.health-access.org/2008/09/health-reform-in-economic-aftermath.htm" target="_blank">major social programs and leaps&#8211;Social Security, Medicare&#8211;happened during similarly tumultuous times</a></strong>.</li>
<li><a title="McCain's health reform plan - more cost, less coverage" href="http://www.joepaduda.com/archives/001306.html" target="_blank">McCain</a> or <a title="Obama's health care blind spot" href="http://www.joepaduda.com/archives/001309.html" target="_blank">Obama</a>?  Joe Paduda analyzes the healthcare reform efforts of the two candidates.</li>
<li><a title="Obama v. McCain on health care. Part 4: Premium subsidies and tax changes" href="http://www.healthbusinessblog.com/?p=1920" target="_blank">Obama vs. McCain</a>? David Williams of the Health Business Blog evaluates the two candidates views on premium subsidies and tax changes.</li>
<li>Colorado legislators may require individual/family health insurance to be guarantee-issue.  <a title="Dangerous Bill To Be Aimed at the Individual Market" href="http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/09/22/dangerous-bill-to-be-aimed-at-the-individual-market/" target="_blank">Will this attempt at &#8220;fairness&#8221; make health insurance unaffordable?</a> Louise Norris of Colorado Health Insurance Insider weighs in.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>DOCTORS [Especially those owning MRI machines]<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="HIPAA Doesn’t Exist For Doctors" href="http://brainblogger.com/2008/09/15/hipaa-doesnt-exist-for-doctors/" target="_blank">What is a sick physician to do</a>: reveal the extent of his condition to his colleagues and have his practice suffer or keep his condition a secret.  Brain Blogger discusses.</li>
<li>David Harlow of Health Blawg wonders if the <a title="DRA advanced imaging cuts examined by GAO; MIPPA accreditation rules welcomed by industry" href="http://healthblawg.typepad.com/healthblawg/2008/09/dra-advanced-imaging-cuts-examined-by-gao-mippa-accreditation-rules-welcomed-by-industry.html" target="_blank">Medicare reimbursement cuts for MRI imaging were too deep</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>THE UNINSURED<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>America has 47 million uninsured&#8230;or does it?  Henry Stern of Insure Blog argues <a title="Vindicated" href="http://insureblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/vindicated.html" target="_blank">the true number of uninsured is only 8 million</a> since since &#8220;a quarter of Americans eligible for Medicaid choose not to sign up&#8221; and 20% of the uninsured are illegal aliens.</li>
<li>America has 47 million uninsured&#8230;the Healthcare Economist takes a look at four of their lives as he <a title="P.O.V.: Critical Condition" href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/10/01/pov-critical-condition/">reviews the PBS documentary <em>Critical Condition</em></a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>KIDS</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Kara Rogers of Britannica Blog claims that <a title="Childhood Obesity: The Educational Cost" href="http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2008/09/childhood-obesity-the-educational-cost/" target="_blank">childhood obesity may hinder educational attainment</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>INTERESTING POSTS that I couldn&#8217;t tie in with the bail out theme</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Caterpillar employees now have a choice: retain the freedom of pharmacy choice and pay a high copay or <a title="WMT + CAT : Pharmacy Future?" href="http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/09/wmt-cat-pharmacys-future.html" target="_blank">go to Wal-mart and pay a low (usually $0) copay</a>.  Adam Fein of Drug Channels explains.</li>
<li>Vince Kuraitis of e-CareManagement Blog:  <a title="What’s the Best Way to Get Hospitals Involved in Care Coordination?" href="http://e-caremanagement.com/whats-the-best-way-to-get-hospitals-involved-in-care-coordination/" target="_blank">What’s the Best Way to Get Hospitals Involved in Care Coordination? Pay them to do it</a>.</li>
<li>Sam Solomon of Canadian Medicine reviews an article in the BMJ that claims that <a title="Unique Quebecers serve as research population for DTC pharma ad study" href="http://canadianmedicine.blogspot.com/2008/09/unique-quebecers-serve-as-research.html" target="_blank">DTC advertising doesn&#8217;t really work</a>.</li>
<li>Annie of Home of the Brave discusses the 60th anniversary of the <a title="Overwhelmed with Gratitude" href="http://revolutionredux.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/overwhelmed-with-gratitude-and-education/" target="_blank">Universal Declaration of Human Rights</a>.</li>
<li>What are the <a title="100 Best Health Care Policy Blogs" href="http://www.rncentral.com/nursing-library/careplans/100_best_health_care_policy_blogs">top 100 health care policy blogs</a>? RN Central lists them for you.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/10/02/700-billion-reasons-to-read-the-health-wonk-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

