VA

You are currently browsing articles tagged VA.

Reducing Medicare and Medicaid spending is not only America’s number one health care goal, it should also be its top overall budget priority.  Finding ways to cut Medicare costs is vital.

Although the CBO projects that Medicare and Medicaid spending will top $850 billion in 2011, we should not forget about another federal health care system on this 4th of July: the VA.

The VA operates 152 hospitals, 133 nursing homes, 824 community-based outpatient clinics and other facilities to provide care to veterans.

According to this Healthcare Finance News article, the federal government is increasing funding for the VA in 2012 and 2013.

President Barack Obama requested $54.9 billion in funding for the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) for fiscal year 2012 and $56.7 billion for fiscal year 2013, according to a report released by the Government Accountability Office this week.

VA officials said the new budget estimate was increased overall by about $1.4 billion for fiscal year 2012 and $1.3 billion for fiscal year 2013 to support healthcare-related initiatives proposed by the Obama administration, such as expanding homeless veterans programs, opening new healthcare facilities, offering additional services for caregivers and providing benefits for veterans exposed to Agent Orange.

On this 4th of July, let’s ponder how the U.S. can best provide effective health care for our nation’s veterans at a reasonable cost.

 

Tags: ,

Veterans Affairs is is responsible for administering programs of veterans’ benefits for veterans, their families, and survivors.  In 2009, the VA had a budget of $87.6 billion and employed nearly 280,000 people at hundreds of Veterans Affairs medical facilities, clinics, and benefits offices.

The VA is often held up a the model for integrated care. Physicians work on a salaried basis.  Patient generally only receive treatment from VA facilities.

Sometimes, however, the VA is not able to provide care in house.  In this case, the Non-VA Purchased Care Program fills this void. The Purchase Care Program supplements rather than replaces the standard VA health care.  Reasons why beneficiaries would access the Purchased Care Program include:

  • Beneficiaries not able to access VA health care facilities
  • Demand exceeds VA health care facility capacity
  • Need for diagnostic support services for VA clinicians
  • Need for scarce specialty resources (e.g., obstetrics, hyperbaric, burn care, oncology) and/or when VA resources are not available due to constraints (e.g. staffing, space)
  • Satisfying patient wait-time requirements
  • Ensure cost-effectiveness for VA (whereby outside procurement vs. maintaining and operating like services in VA facilities and/or infrequent use is more appropriate)

The Purchased Care Program has expanded over the years.  In fiscal year 2005, the PCP program served about 500,000 veterans and had program expenses of $1.5 billion.  By FY2008, the program served almost 800,000 veterans had had expenses of over $3 billion.   FY08 expenses include:

  • 35% for pre-authorized outpatient care,
  • 22% for pre-authorized inpatient care,
  • 14% for community nursing home services,
  • 12% for home health services,
  • 9% for military care,
  • 5% for unauthorized care, and
  • 3%  for other services.

Tags: ,

In the past, I have commented on an article by Phillip Longman describing the quality of care at the VA.  Mr. Longman recently wrote a book titled The Best Care Anywhere.  The book claims that “the long-maligned Veterans Health Administration has become the highest-quality healthcare provider in the United States.”

Gooznews interviews Mr. Longman.  Below are some excerpts:

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,

Arnold Kling and Michael Cannon believe that the idea of the physician as a lone independent craftsment is out-of-date.  The authors contend that healthcare quality would improve and costs would drop if physicians adopted a more corporate environment.  Larger organizations, such as the Mayo Clinic, Kaiser Permanente and Veterans Affairs all benefit from economies of scale and a team-based medical approach.  Nevertheless, physicians generally are loath to accept this organizational structure, because they do not want their own authority and decision-making abilities undermined by a larger corporate structure.  Below are some excerpts from their article “Does the Doctor Need a Boss?

  • “Medicare’s payment system generally does not reward coordination. Instead, Medicare and other fee-for-service payers tend to favor technologically intensive specialist services over those of general practitioners who might be best suited to play the role of project manager. The mismatch between payment systems and patients’ needs can be seen in the fact that the supply of gerontologists is not increasing, in spite of the obvious demographic basis for greater demand and the value gerontologists can add as project managers for those who are least able to coordinate their own care.”
  • “…the markets for legal and accounting services are dominated by corporate providers that can hire, coordinate, and monitor the services of those specialists. In medicine, transaction costs include the costs of soliciting input, sharing information, and coordinating treatment among multiple clinicians, often across space and time. Thus it is not unreasonable to think that delivering health care effectively, particularly for complex patients, could require a corporate model of organization.”
  • “In a corporate setting, a doctor would not have a business or administrative function. The doctor would not worry about what is billable and what is not. Instead, the doctor’s job would be to serve patients according to corporate standards. The doctor would be paid a salary, with increases, bonuses, and other incentives that take into account direct observation of the doctor as well as patient satisfaction and peer evaluations.”
  • “There is nothing magical about a corporation as an organization. Corporate bureaucracies are inherently inflexible, imperfect, and unimaginative. Competitive market pressures force corporations to overcome those limitations and are therefore essential to improving medical care. If corporations risk losing customers when they fail to keep pace with market standards for excellence, they will find a way to improve—or go out of business.”

Citation

Tags: , ,

One health risk factor often overlooked in this blog is going to war.  Veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan frequently return home with traumatic brain injury from roadside bombs, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),  and other injuries.  

Marketplace chronicles the problems veterans experience trying to collect military benefits after returning to civilian life.  The article reports that it can be difficult for Veterans to claim indemnity benefits.  

Soldiers given a military disability rating below 30 percent get a one-time severance payment instead of life-long medical benefits for the whole family. Kerry Baker — with the Disabled American Veterans — says the army cherry-picks lesser injuries when applying its disability standards. In military-speak, disabilities are referred to as “unfitting conditions.” That’s any injury that prevents soldiers from performing their duties.

Further, getting medical care at the VA is difficult during wartime.  The VA has a “backlog for disability claims is in the hundreds of thousands.”

The human and financial cost from war does not end at the close of combat.  These issues will linger on for years to come.

Tags: , ,