Workers Comp

You are currently browsing articles tagged Workers Comp.

People today want high quality health care at lower cost (to be honest, people throughout history have always wanted better quality and lower cost).  However, defining the ‘value’ of medical services is not easy.  In fact, it is often difficult for companies to demonstrate to customers that they provide superior value.  Joe Paduda has a great post which evaluated who different managed care stakeholders evaluate the healthcare value differently.

  • For the managed care exec, value can be easily defined as costs that are lower, usually on a per-service basis, than they would otherwise pay. X% less than current pricing is better than current pricing, so the benefit is obvious and clear.
  • For the adjuster, the definition isn’t quite so apparent. With a desk swamped under case files and a screen stuffed with flashing ‘red flags’ on critical diary entries, there’s less focus on finding the cheapest wheelchair and more interest in picking a vendor that can take work off the adjuster’s desk, do it competently and without claimant complaint, and provide documentation that, at a maximum, is readily cut-and-pasted into the claim file.
  • For the claim manager, it’s about closing files, minimizing litigation, and avoiding those calls from Home Office management about low network penetration and excessive use of non-authorized vendors, while struggling to keep overworked, underpaid, and unappreciated adjusters on the job and out of the clutches of headhunters.
  • For the employer, value is fast, thorough medical care that gets the injured worker back on the job and keeps her/him there…unless the employer is dealing with declining revenues, in which case they don’t want John/Jane Doe back at work no matter what, as there isn’t any job for her/him and they sure don’t want to yet another unemployment claim.
  • For the TPA, value is defined as the savings below fee schedule or U&C, which is the basis for calculation of their managed care fees, typically around 25 – 30%. The more services, the bigger the bills, the more ‘savings’ generated and the more fees ‘earned’.

Even in health care, value is truly in the eye of the beholder.

Tags: , ,

Joe Paduda finds the price inflation is slowing for drug purchased through Workers Comp programs.

“Drug trend continues to moderate, with inflation in 2007 coming in at 4.3%. That’s a big improvement over last year’s 6.5%, which was a big improvement over the previous year’s 9.5%…”

One reason for the price decline may be that more people are using generic drugs. The percentage of prescriptions filled with generic “looks to be in the high seventy percent range.”

Mr. Paduda is also compiling his Fifth Annual Survey of Prescription Drug Management in Workers Comp which I am sure will be an interesting read.

Tags: , ,

Joe Paduda has a great post (“Wasted Dollars“) reviewing a study by Alex Swedlow. The study focuses on waste in the health care sector with a focus on Workers Compensation. Mr. Paduda concludes the following:

There’s a lesson here for the non-workers comp world, and policy wonks in particular. It is this – providers overtreat, to the detriment of the patient and the payer. Draconian measures such as flat limits on the amount of treatment do work.

With health reform on the horizon, here’s a great example of the waste in our health care ‘system’, waste that benefits the provider.

Paduda claims that Draconian measure work.  They key is that policymakers/bureaucrats set these limits at an economically efficient amount.  If the medical care becomes too limited (e.g.: the number of doctors visits allowed is below the optimal level for many patients) then patient care could be hurt.  If the limits are too high, than there may be no cost savings.

In the California Workers Comp example, Paduda says regulators got it right.

Tags: